New Project
Upload project files to extract soil parameters, run design recommendations, and generate an engineer-reviewed proposal.
Upload Geotechnical Report
Step 1 - Extract soil parameters automatically
Drop geotechnical PDF here
or click to browse · Supports text-based and scanned PDFs · 25-80 pages typical
Structural Drawings
Step 2 - Pile quantity and spacing extraction
Drop structural drawings here
Blueprints, foundation plans, permit sets · Phase 5: full CV parsing
Extracted Soil Parameters
From geotechnical report · Review gate: engineer verifies before accepting
| Stratum | Depth (ft) | Classification | SPT N | Su (psf) | φ (°) | γ (pcf) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0-4 | CH - Fat clay | 4 | 2,400 | 0 | 120 |
| 2 | 4-12 | CL - Lean clay | 8 | 3,600 | 22 | 122 |
| 3 | 12-20 | SP - Poorly graded sand | 22 | - | 34 | 118 |
| 4 | 20-35 | GW - Well graded gravel | 40+ | - | 38 | 125 |
Project Status
Ready for Analysis
PM: Brandon Hindbo · Project: PRU26300
Data Sources
HPD Imperial Design
MCE Cost Model
RFQ / Caps Library
Historical Reports
Compute Node
Mac Studio Online
Local deployment · Zero external token cost
Design Recommendations
Engineering-validated pile configurations ranked by confidence, installability, and cost.
Recommendation #1
Highest confidence · Historical match found
2.875" shaft / 8-10-12 helix / 8.5m embedment
Compression: 128 kN · Tension: 94 kN · Torque: 4.4 kN·m
Compression: 128 kN · Tension: 94 kN · Torque: 4.4 kN·m
Structural
Approved
Recommendation #2
Lower cost · Higher installability
2.875" shaft / 10-12 helix / 7.2m embedment
Compression: 112 kN · Tension: 81 kN · Torque: 3.9 kN·m
Compression: 112 kN · Tension: 81 kN · Torque: 3.9 kN·m
Geotech
Review
Recommendation #3
Conservative · Higher safety margin
3.5" shaft / 10-12-14 helix / 9.1m embedment
Compression: 156 kN · Tension: 118 kN · Torque: 5.8 kN·m
Compression: 156 kN · Tension: 118 kN · Torque: 5.8 kN·m
Durability
Approved
Code & Spacing Checks
| Check | Standard | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum spacing | 3D center-to-center | Pass |
| Corrosion protection | 50-year design life | Pass |
| Lateral capacity | CSA S6 | Review |
| Zone C spacing | CSA S6 | Flag |
Cost Heat Map
12 configurations evaluated with live pricing
Ask AI
Engineering assistant trained on Cyntech design history, RFQ templates, and codes.
Engineering Assistant
Suggested Prompts
Project History
All designs with full provenance, audit trail, and confidence scores.
Recent Projects
4,200+ historical projects indexed
| ID | Project Name | Date | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CY-2024-041 | Highway 2 North Segment 3 | 2024-09-12 | Approved | 94% |
| CY-2024-038 | Red Deer Interchange Piles | 2024-08-29 | Approved | 91% |
| CY-2024-031 | Leduc Industrial Yard | 2024-07-15 | Review | 87% |
| CY-2024-024 | Calgary Trail South | 2024-06-22 | Approved | 93% |
AI Performance
Accuracy, confidence, and failure-class tracking across the recommendation engine.
93.4%
Overall Accuracy
+2.1% vs last quarter
91%
Recommendation Match
vs senior engineer
89%
Avg Confidence
Above threshold
2.7%
False Positive Rate
Target <5%
Accuracy by Step
Soil parameter extraction96%
Pile quantity / spacing91%
Code check validation88%
BOM & cost estimation85%
System Monitoring
Local node health, job queue, and pipeline status in real time.
Node Health
Mac Studio Online · Last check: 14s ago
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Logic Engine | Healthy |
| Tiered Memory | Healthy |
| Citation Layer | Healthy |
| Document Parser | Degraded |
| Audit Logger | Healthy |
Active Jobs
Real-time pipeline queue
09:14Analysis CY-2025-012 completed - 91% confidence
09:08Document CY-2025-012-RFQ.pdf parsed
08:44User bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com logged in
08:43HPD Imperial Design v2.17.05 indexed
08:12Recommendation engine batch job finished
Audit Logs
Immutable decision trail for compliance and engineer review.
Complete Audit Trail
Every decision traced · Immutable log
| Time | User | Action | Object | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:12:04 | bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com | Run analysis | CY-2025-012 | Success |
| 09:08:22 | system | Index update | HPD v2.17.05 | Success |
| 08:44:11 | bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com | Upload RFQ | CY-2025-012-RFQ.pdf | Success |
| 08:43:55 | system | Compliance scan | All projects | Passed |
| 08:12:00 | system | Backup | Knowledge base | Success |
Confidence Configuration
Governance thresholds that gate auto-approval vs mandatory human review.
Auto-Approval Thresholds
90%
90%
80%
80%
65%
65%
Review Gate Rules
- ⬡All >90% recommendations auto-logged
- ⬡80-90% flagged for senior review
- ⬡<80% blocked from client delivery
- ⬡Manual overrides recorded in audit trail
- ⬡Confidence tied to document version