CYN_LOG_SUB_COL_RGB
Client Knowledge Portal
Systems Live Demo Environment
$18,000
Module build
One-time, CAD
~$1,700
Hardware
Single local node · You own it
$2,500
Monthly module retainer
Optional from go-live
Investment
ItemCostWho pays
Geotech GPT Phase 1 build$18,000 CADCyntech
Hardware — single local node~$1,700 CADCyntech (you own it)
Managed module retainer (optional from go-live)$2,500 CAD / monthCyntech only if retained
Total Phase 1 investment (without retainer)~$19,700 CAD
Module retainer: $2,500 CAD/month starts only after go-live, only if Cyntech chooses to keep Oction managing the single Geotech GPT module. No term, cancel anytime with 30 days written notice. Includes system management, updates, and optimization for this module only. Token or inference costs, if any, are paid directly by Cyntech.
Timeline
WeekActivity
Week 0Proposal signed, deposit paid, hardware ordered
Week 1Hardware delivered, software deployed, report samples provided
Week 2Parser tuned to Cyntech formats, HPD output validated
Week 3Historical reports indexed, 10-report test run
Week 4Benchmark report delivered, training, go/no-go decision
What you get
  • ✓ Geotech PDF parser with HPD-ready soil table output
  • ✓ Searchable historical geotechnical report knowledge base
  • ✓ Engineer review gate on every extraction
  • ✓ Simple internal web portal on Cyntech network
  • ✓ Benchmark report on 10 real Cyntech reports
  • ✓ 1-hour training for up to 5 engineers
  • ✗ No structural drawing parser, HPD engine, pricing, or CRM integration
Go / No-Go at Week 4

Cyntech keeps the hardware, data, and working portal regardless of whether the full build proceeds. If Cyntech continues, the $18,000 Phase 1 fee credits 100% toward the full build.

Upload Geotechnical Report
Extract soil parameters automatically
Required

Drop geotechnical PDF here

or click to browse · 25-80 pages typical

Module Status
Ready for Upload
Local node online · Zero external token cost
Extracted Soil Parameters
HPD-ready table · Awaiting engineer verification
Review
StratumDepth (ft)ClassificationSPT NSu (psf)φ (°)γ (pcf)
10-4CH - Fat clay42,4000120
24-12CL - Lean clay83,60022122
312-20SP - Poorly graded sand22-34118
Ask AI — Historical Geotech Reports
Has Cyntech ever worked in Edmonton CH clay with a 100 kip compression load?
10:42 AM
Yes. 7 historical projects show this soil-load combination.closest match: CY-2023-018 used a 2.875" shaft at 7.2m embedment with 94% confidence.
10:42 AM
$148,000
Total build fee
CAD, all five phases
$10,000
Monthly retainer
Starts at Phase 3 go-live
Q1
Payback window
Conservative 60% recovery
Build Investment by Phase
PhaseNameTimelineInvestment
Phase 1Geotech Reader4 weeks$18,000 CAD
Phase 2Design Engine + Engineer Portal5 weeks$25,000 CAD
Phase 3Production Ready4 weeks$25,000 CAD
Phase 1-3 total$68,000 CAD
Phase 4Pricing Automation (BOM, RFQ, MCE, heat map)8-10 weeks$45,000 CAD
Phase 5Structural Drawing Computer Vision6-8 weeks$35,000 CAD
Total build fee$148,000 CAD
Monthly Retainer

$10,000 CAD per month begins at Phase 3 go-live after the 85% benchmark pass. 12-month initial term, then month-to-month with 60 days written notice.

  • ✓ System management, optimization, and model updates
  • ✓ All support and continuous improvements
  • ✗ Token / inference costs paid directly by Cyntech — never marked up
Deployment Options
Local cluster

Zero marginal inference cost · Fixed retainer covers remote management · Cyntech owns hardware

Managed cloud

Remote access from any office · Cyntech pays cloud API costs directly · No on-site hardware

Out of Scope

Post-Award phases (Award-Project Initialization, Manufacturing, Installation, Invoicing, Closeout, Warranty) contain 45+ additional workflow steps and are not included. Phase 4 alone is larger than the entire Pre-Award scope and would require separate scoping.

Upload Geotechnical Report
Step 1 - Extract soil parameters automatically
Required

Drop geotechnical PDF here

or click to browse · Supports text-based and scanned PDFs · 25-80 pages typical

Structural Drawings
Step 2 - Pile quantity and spacing extraction
Optional

Drop structural drawings here

Blueprints, foundation plans, permit sets · Phase 5: full CV parsing

Extracted Soil Parameters
From geotechnical report · Review gate: engineer verifies before accepting
Verified
StratumDepth (ft)ClassificationSPT NSu (psf)φ (°)γ (pcf)
10-4CH - Fat clay42,4000120
24-12CL - Lean clay83,60022122
312-20SP - Poorly graded sand22-34118
420-35GW - Well graded gravel40+-38125
Project Status
Ready for Analysis
PM: Brandon Hindbo · Project: PRU26300
Data Sources
HPD Imperial Design
MCE Cost Model
RFQ / Caps Library
Historical Reports
Compute Node
Mac Studio Online
Local deployment · Zero external token cost
Recommendation #1
Highest confidence · Historical match found
94% match
2.875" shaft / 8-10-12 helix / 8.5m embedment
Compression: 128 kN · Tension: 94 kN · Torque: 4.4 kN·m
Structural Approved
Recommendation #2
Lower cost · Higher installability
87% match
2.875" shaft / 10-12 helix / 7.2m embedment
Compression: 112 kN · Tension: 81 kN · Torque: 3.9 kN·m
Geotech Review
Recommendation #3
Conservative · Higher safety margin
82% match
3.5" shaft / 10-12-14 helix / 9.1m embedment
Compression: 156 kN · Tension: 118 kN · Torque: 5.8 kN·m
Durability Approved
Code & Spacing Checks
CheckStandardResult
Minimum spacing3D center-to-centerPass
Corrosion protection50-year design lifePass
Lateral capacityCSA S6Review
Zone C spacingCSA S6Flag
Cost Heat Map
12 configurations evaluated with live pricing
2.7"
8-10
2.7"
10-12
2.8"
8-10
2.8"
10-12
2.8"
10-12-14
3.5"
10-12
3.5"
12-14
Engineering Assistant
What pile section should I use for 75 kN compression in loose sand?
10:42 AM
For 75 kN compression in loose sand, a 2.875" shaft with 10/12 helix configuration at 5.5m embedment provides a safety factor of 2.1. Reference: 4 similar designs with 94% confidence.
10:42 AM
Suggested Prompts
Recent Projects
4,200+ historical projects indexed
IDProject NameDateStatusConfidence
CY-2024-041Highway 2 North Segment 32024-09-12Approved94%
CY-2024-038Red Deer Interchange Piles2024-08-29Approved91%
CY-2024-031Leduc Industrial Yard2024-07-15Review87%
CY-2024-024Calgary Trail South2024-06-22Approved93%
93.4%
Overall Accuracy
+2.1% vs last quarter
91%
Recommendation Match
vs senior engineer
89%
Avg Confidence
Above threshold
2.7%
False Positive Rate
Target <5%
Accuracy by Step
Soil parameter extraction96%
Pile quantity / spacing91%
Code check validation88%
BOM & cost estimation85%
Node Health
Mac Studio Online · Last check: 14s ago
Healthy
ComponentStatus
Logic EngineHealthy
Tiered MemoryHealthy
Citation LayerHealthy
Document ParserDegraded
Audit LoggerHealthy
Active Jobs
Real-time pipeline queue
09:14Analysis CY-2025-012 completed - 91% confidence
09:08Document CY-2025-012-RFQ.pdf parsed
08:44User bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com logged in
08:43HPD Imperial Design v2.17.05 indexed
08:12Recommendation engine batch job finished
Complete Audit Trail
Every decision traced · Immutable log
TimeUserActionObjectResult
09:12:04bhindbo@cyntechgroup.comRun analysisCY-2025-012Success
09:08:22systemIndex updateHPD v2.17.05Success
08:44:11bhindbo@cyntechgroup.comUpload RFQCY-2025-012-RFQ.pdfSuccess
08:43:55systemCompliance scanAll projectsPassed
08:12:00systemBackupKnowledge baseSuccess
Auto-Approval Thresholds
90%
90%
80%
80%
65%
65%
Review Gate Rules
  • ⬡All >90% recommendations auto-logged
  • ⬡80-90% flagged for senior review
  • ⬡<80% blocked from client delivery
  • ⬡Manual overrides recorded in audit trail
  • ⬡Confidence tied to document version